work is properly cited. Monetary Policy and Stock Markets Evidence from EU Countries Authors

The analysis of monetary policy impact - via interest rate as instrument of intervention - on the evolution of stock market prices has gained more popularity during the current crisis due to the accumulation of financial imbalances. This article investigates the impact of monetary policy on equity indexes in European Union countries from January 2000 to February 2012, using cointegration and Granger causality tests. The results reveal the existence of long and short term relationship between stock prices and interest rates. We also find that on the long-run the comovement between interest rates and stock prices are stronger during crisis period, when compared with entire period.


Introduction
Lately, the whole EU financial stability has strengthened, but continues to record significant challenges in terms of increased sovereign risk in some countries with a difficult situation regarding the sustainability of public finances and in terms of maintaining vulnerabilities in some financial sectors.EU authorities' reaction on improving economic governance system has been creating a permanent mechanism to support financial stability and implementing new micro and macro-prudential financial supervision architecture.
The main objective stipulated in the status of all central banks from EU countries is to ensure price stability.Moreover, the recent crisis embodied the fact that extending the mandate of the central banks' price stability to financial system should be taken into account.Several arguments in this regard are: the fact that central banks benefit of essential expertise in analyzing financial systems from a global perspective and have appropriate incentives to mitigate systemic risk ex ante; the harmonization of national macro-prudential framework through a coordinated approach at European level would facilitate a more clear establishment of responsibilities and improving governance.The cons are mainly: the fact that is difficult to determine the right time for a proactive response of monetary policy; the existence of a risk of overload objectives; the non-linearity and unpredictability of financial crisis.
The transmission channels of monetary policy in UE countries are influenced by certain factors like low or high level of monetization, the structure of the financial system (bank oriented or financial market oriented financial system, the preponderance of foreign capital in some countries), that influence the effectiveness of monetary policy on capital markets.

Communications of the IBIMA 2
The purpose of our paper is to analyze the relationship between monetary policy and stock markets indices in European Union, related to the financial crisis from 2008.We conducted our research for several reasons.First, the recent crisis highlighted the necessity to place more emphasis on the objective of maintaining financial stability by central banks.Second, even if central bank monitors the developments in financial markets, in the literature does not exist consensus regarding the role of monetary authorities in the management of asset prices developments.In this regard, a number of authors argue that central bank should not take into consideration asset prices developments (Assenmacher-Wesche and Gerlach, 2008;Hunter et al., 2005), while other authors (Bordo and Jeanne, 2002) argue that monetary policy should respond to changes in stock prices.Third, the EU economies are closely interrelated in terms of trade relations and geographic proximity.
Our findings suggest that there exist a longrun relationship between interest rates and stock prices, and this is strengthening during the crisis period.In terms of causal relationship, the comovement between stock and money markets is lower during the crisis periods than during those that are tranquil The rest of the paper proceeds as follows.Section 2 briefly surveys the major contributions of the literature review.Section 3 explains our data set and the methodology used.Section 4 discusses the empirical results.Section 5 brings the main conclusions.

Literature Review
The evolution of stock prices presents important implications upon financial stability, because speculative bubbles may degenerate into a financial crisis.Central banks monitors the developments in financial markets, but in the literature does not exist a unanimous consensus regarding the role of monetary authorities on stock market.
A number of authors argue that central bank should not take into consideration asset prices developments.Among them, are found Assenmacher-Wesche and Gerlach ( 2008) who shows that setting the monetary policy's response to asset price movements can generate higher losses than those resulting from a possible explosion of asset bubbles.The same position is adopted by Illing (2006) who argues that a possible central bank intervention on asset markets, through injecting liquidities, may increase financial instability.Hunter et al. (2005) argue that monetary authorities are unable to identify financial imbalances early enough and with the necessary degree of comfort to take remedial measure, because trying to respond to financial imbalances may increase the volatility of the economy.In addition, Bullard and Schaling (2002) share views on the fact that including stock market variables in monetary policy reaction functions might at best be irrelevant for the overall economic outcome, but might cause considerable harm in the worst case.In contrast, Bordo and Jeanne (2002) argue that monetary policy should respond to changes in stock prices because drastic changes in these have strong and persistent negative effects on output and employment.
The causal dynamics between interest rates and asset returns have become the subject of intensive research by financial economists to explain asset prices.In this regard, changes in the interest rate affects the investors required rate of return and therefore stock prices, resulting that interest rate and stock prices should have a negative relationship.The responses estimation of asset prices in changes of monetary policy is hampered by the endogeneity of political decisions and by the fact that both interest rates and asset prices are influenced by many variables (Rigobon and Sack, 2004).Moreover, Kaul (1987) argues that the nature of the relationship varies in a systematic manner depending on whether money supply is countercyclical or procyclical.However, the general conclusion is that stock markets are sensitive to unexpected changes in monetary policy and the sensitivity depends by the economy's particularities.
Hussain (2010) highlights the fact that monetary policy decisions have a significant and immediate influence on volatility and stock index returns in both European (France, Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdom) and the U.S. markets.On the same level of intraday data is situated the research realized by Farka (2009) which provide a similar conclusion, noting that volatility depends on the type and timing of monetary policy shocks.Andersson (2010) analyzes bond and stock market volatility reactions in euro area and U.S. under the impact of monetary policy decisions and he discovers a significant growth of intraday volatility as following monetary policy decisions of the two central banks.Bjorland and Leitamo (2009) analyze the interdependence between U.S. monetary policy and the development of S&P500 stock market index, finding a great interdependence between the interest rate setting and real stock prices.Vithessonthi and Techarongrojwong (2012) demonstrate that changes in the monetary policy have an impact on stock prices and that these respond negatively to the expected change in the repurchase rate in the context of Thailand.On this topic there exist numerous studies which embrace the idea that monetary policy actions are associated with changes in stock prices (Bredin et al., 2007;Konrad, 2009).In contrast with the result obtained for U.S. and Thailand, the empirical findings of Bohl et al. (2007) show a generally low relationship between German market index return and interest rates on short term, in 1985-1998.However, as in the United States, Bundesbank reacted to stock market crash from 1987 by relaxing monetary policy conditions.Also referring to Germany and in addition to U.K., Corallo (2006) finds that an unexpected increase in the interest rate depresses equity prices, but this relationship is not statistically significant.Li, Işcan and Xu (2010) find that in Canada, the immediate response of stock prices to an internal contradictory monetary policy shock is low and on short time, while in the United States, the immediate response to a similar shock in stock prices is more significant and its dynamic response is relatively long.Also, Ioannidis and Kontonikas (2008) investigates the impact of monetary policy on index returns in 13 OECD countries during 1972-2002 period, and the results indicates that a change in monetary policy significantly affect index returns.Going further with the analysis, Pennings et al. (2011) estimate the impact of monetary policy upon exchange rates and stock markets for eight open economies, showing that, on average, in these countries, an increase by one percentage point in official interest rates determines an appreciation on exchange rate by 1% and a decrease, by the same percentage, of stock market indices.
The recent financial crisis has demonstrated that the potential economic and social costs of financial instability can be devastating.The existing consensus before triggering the crisis in accordance to which the monetary policy should take asset prices into account only if these affect inflation, is challenged.In the modern literature we find few studies regarding the role of stock markets in central bank policy in non-crisis periods, particularly for the European Central Bank.A representative study is realized by Botzen and Marey (2010), who analyze the influence of stock price developments upon the ECB's monetary policy over the period 1999-2005.The authors find that the evolution of stock prices has exerted influence on the key ECB interest rates before the crisis.Cassola and Morana (2004) emphasized the fact that stock prices seem to hold an important role in the transmission mechanism in the euro area and that a monetary policy focused on long-term price stability can also ensure the stability of the stock market.
Aiming the long-term synergy between price stability and financial stability, monetary policy should take into account asset price developments, but should not be overlooked that the impact on capital market of the instruments used depends on other factor like: the openness of the economy, capital market importance within financial system, credibility and transparency of monetary authorities.

Data
The data consists in short-term interest rate monthly data and stock price index data covering the period January 2000 February 2012 for all 27 EU members, namely: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.We choose money market interest rate because the deposits represent an alternative to portfolio investment.The data were collected from Eurostat Database.
In order to investigate whether or not the causality between interest rate and stock prices changes over time, we construct a number of time series samples from our data set: the entire period, and a post crisis sub period (July 1, 2007to February 29, 2012).

Methodology
The first step is to test the stationarity of the data series.In this regard w Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Kwiatkowski-Philips-Schmidt tests .
We then perform Engle Granger Test to see if the components of a .If the test suggests the presence integration between the variables we then perform the Johansen-Juselius likelihood co integration tests to identify the existence of co-integrating vectors.
Where i =r+1, . .., n, are the squared canonical correlations, -1, and , when all first trace test is testing the hypothesis that there are at most r distinct co vectors against a general alternative, while the second test is used to compare the null hypothesis of r co-integratin the alternative of (r + 1) vectors.The first test is preferred to the second one because it is more powerful (Alagidede et al., 2011).
Depending on the results of the co integration test we applied the unrestricted VAR -if there is no co-integration between the two variables -or the Vector Error Correction, otherwise.
Let Yt be a VAR model of order p with the following standard representation:

) (
Where the vector Y describes the vector of the two endogenous variables, which is given by short-term interest rate and the stock prices.Φ(L) is a lag polynomial of order p.
The lag length of unrestricted VAR is determined by the use of information criteria -Akaike's information criteria (AIC) of the underlying un-differenced VAR model.

Communications of the
If the test suggests the presence of cointegration between the variables we then Juselius likelihood cointegration tests to identify the existence of r , are the (n -r) smallest squared canonical correlations, r =0, 1, 2,. .., n , when all .The first trace test is testing the hypothesis that distinct co-integrating vectors against a general alternative, while the second test is used to compare the null integrating vectors against (r + 1) co-integrating vectors.The first test is preferred to the second one because it is more powerful Depending on the results of the cointegration test we applied the unrestricted integration between or the Vector Error be a VAR model of order p with the following standard representation: re the vector Y describes the vector of the two endogenous variables, which is given term interest rate and the stock prices.Φ(L) is a lag polynomial of order p.We performed the causality test through a VECM approach if the set of variables are co integrated (Alagidede et al., 2011).

Empirical Results
First, the ADF unit root and the KPSS stationary tests were employed (the results are not given here but are available by the authors upon request) in order to determine the order of integration.Stationarity hypothesis is rejected for in all cases, ADF results confirming that all series are integrated of first order.This is confirmed also through the KPSS test.
Since all the variables have the same order of integration we proceed by employing the Engle-Granger test.If interest rates and stock prices are co-integrated, then an error The results from comparing the two tables highlight that the residuals are stationary only in the cases of Netherlands, France, Finland and Italy, which implies co integration existence in the entire period (the results are not given here but are available by the authors upon request).Regarding the second sub-period, the null hypothesis of no co-integration between the variables is rejected in more states, i.e.Netherlands, Austria, Belgium, Romania, Cyprus, France, United Kingdom, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Latvia and Slovenia.The overall results, therefore, indicate that there is a long relationship among the two variables only in the reminded countries.This establishes the fact that when markets react actively, interest rates affect the mentioned capital markets in long term.This is also supported by Adam and Tweneboah (2008), who established that long-run relationship existed between interest rates and stock prices in Ghana and by Pal and Mittal (2011) in the case of India.In the rest of the cases the two variables are not co-integrated.In the same sense, Korkeamäki (2011) find that while stock returns in most countries in the Western Europe were negatively correlated with interest rate changes prior to the euro, that correlation has disappeared since 1999.
The previously test informed us on the existence of long-term links between variables in several EU countries, and for finding the number of vectors in this test we perform Johansen Co-integration test on correction term should be included in the bivariate autoregressions.We estimate the error correction term using the residual from a regression (OLS) of interest rates series and stock prices series and then we apply the test to see if the residuals are stationary.If the residuals of the regression are stationary, the variables are co-integrated and the resulted equation is a co-integrating term equilibrium relationship).Data from the output table are then compared with critical values from Granger Residual Based Table Test.The results from comparing the two tables highlight that the residuals are stationary only in the cases of Netherlands, France, Finland and Italy, which implies con existence in the entire period (the results are not given here but are available by the authors upon request).Regarding the period, the null hypothesis of no integration between the variables is rejected in more states, i.e.Netherlands, ustria, Belgium, Romania, Cyprus, France, United Kingdom, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Latvia and Slovenia.The overall results, therefore, indicate that there is a long-run equilibrium relationship among the two variables only in the reminded countries.This establishes the fact that when markets react actively, interest rates affect the mentioned capital markets in long term.This is also supported by Adam and Tweneboah (2008), who run relationship existed tween interest rates and stock prices in Ghana and by Pal and Mittal (2011) in the case of India.In the rest of the cases the two integrated.In the same sense, Korkeamäki (2011) find that while stock returns in most countries in the Western Europe were negatively correlated with interest rate changes prior to the euro, that correlation has disappeared since 1999.
The previously test informed us on the term links between variables in several EU countries, and for nding the number of vectors in this test we integration test on Communications of the IBIMA 6 interest rates and price indexes in the two periods, as presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.However, since we took into consideration countries pairs it is obvious that there can not be more than one cointegration vector between the analysed variables.
The finding are consistent with the results of past literature that in some countries the no long-run co-integration relationship between interest rate and stock prices exist (Korkeamäki, 2011), while in other cases the long-run co-integration between the two variables exist (Adam and Tweneboah, 2008;Pal and Mittal, 2011).However, when we took into consideration the post-crisis period, the situation is different, highlighting the fact that this dynamics exist amongst the two variables in twenty countries.This means that long-run linkages among the interest rates and stock prices are more inclined to occur during the crisis period than in calm ones.These results might be due to the contagion or spillover between the two variables during the crisis and to the investors' uncertainty regarding the unfavorable macroeconomic environment.In addition, this findings support Lin's (2012) research, which emphasize that the comovement between macroeconomic variables and stock prices becomes stronger during crisis periods than during tranquil ones.A1 in Appendix A for both periods.In the tables below we will show only the causal relationship between the analysed variables that are statistically significant at 5%.We will note with SP the stock price and with IR the interest rate.
The results of Table 3 shows the causality results for the full sample period, in which it can be observed that the direction of causation: is bi-directional for Germany, Sweden, France, Italy and Estonia, is unidirectional from the stock to the money market for Greece, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, United Kingdom, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Spain, and is non-causal for Netherlands, Romania, Hungary, Malta, Bulgaria, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and Slovakia.Therefore, the results suggest that there is more evidence that the causation runs from stock market to money market than the reverse.These results are in line with the Bhattarai and Joshi (2009), study which finds that there is lack of relationship in the short-run between interest rate and stock market in Nepal, and with Pal and Mittal (2011) study which reveals that interest rates have insignificant relationship with stock prices in India.The results from the subsample presented in Table 4 suggest that on the short-run the comovement between stock and money markets is lower during the crisis periods than during the entire analyzed period.This findings suggest that on the short term the stock market and the money market might be influenced by other factors like external shocks or investors' uncertainty,

Conclusion
This study has investigated the comovement between interest rates and stock prices in EU markets.Using Johansen and Granger causality tests for the period January 2000 to February 2012, the study documented both short-run and long-run interdependence among stock index and interest rates.Employing Johansen co-integration analysis, we found that over the entire period, the long-term relationship does exist between the two variables only in the cases of Netherlands, France, Finland and Italy.However, when we took into consideration the crisis period, the situation was different, highlighting the fact that this dynamics exist amongst the two variables in twenty countries from a total of twenty seven.These results might be due to the contagion or spillover between the two variables during the crisis and to the investors' uncertainty regarding the unfavorable macroeconomic environment.Also, before the crisis, the central banks based their monetary policy projections on a short horizon, disregarding the financial imbalances which are built on a much longer time.Given the actual crisis, the political economy has received a warning with respect to this mismatch, therefore is trying to harmonize both, monetary policy and financial stability policy.
In the short-run, the direction of causation over the entire sample is bi-directional for Germany, Sweden, France, Italy and Estonia, is unidirectional from the stock to the money market for the Greece, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, United Kingdom, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Spain, and is non-causal for Netherlands, Romania, Hungary, Malta, Bulgaria, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and Slovakia.Moreover, the findings regarding the two variables during the crisis suggest there exist a smaller number of markets that register a causal relationship between interest rates and stock index.These results might be due to the existence of more important factors that affect the stock market on the short-run, like uncertainty among investors and external shocks.
The limits of our paper consist in the fact that we took into consideration low frequency index, i.e. monthly, meaning the fact that we didn't incorporate all the changes that occurred during the month.Moreover, we might consider as a proxy variable for the monetary policy other variables as inflation rate, regarding the fact that the literature emphasis the direct relation between inflation and stocks.
For future research it would be interesting to analyse the impact of key interest rate (proxy variable for monetary stability) on market interest rates, nominal exchange rate, stock index, loan / deposit ratio (proxy variable for financial stability).