Oocysticidal Effect of Essential Oil Components against Chicken Eimeria Oocysts

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine: Research & Reports

Download PDF  | Download for mobile

Adnane Remmal, Sanaa Achahbar, Latifa Bouddine, Fouzia Chami and Najat Chami

Laboratory of Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mehrez, Fez, Morocco

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 599816, International Journal of Veterinary Medicine: Research & Reports, 8 pages, DOI: 10.5171/2013.599816

Received date : 22 January 2013; Accepted date : 5 February 2013; Published date : 28 May 2013

Academic editor: João Luís Garcia

Cite this Article as: Adnane Remmal, Sanaa Achahbar, Latifa Bouddine, Fouzia Chami and Najat Chami (2013), "Oocysticidal Effect of Essential Oil Components against Chicken Eimeria Oocysts," International Journal of Veterinary Medicine: Research & Reports, Vol. 2013 (2013), Article ID 599816, DOI: 10.5171/2013.599816

Copyright © 2013 Adnane Remmal, Sanaa Achahbar, Latifa Bouddine, Fouzia Chami and Najat Chami. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 3.0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the ability of some major components of essential oils (EOs) to destroy Eimeria oocysts in vitro and to find out how the mechanism of action involved in this oocysticidal effect works. The methodology used was as follows: A screening of the oocysticidal activity of eight EO components was carried out in a liquid medium. The release of substances absorbing at 273 nm was measured after treatment of Eimeria oocysts with these components. The results we obtained showed that carvacrol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol, and eugenol have the most effective activity. The treatment of Eimeria oocysts with these components led to their lysis in a dose and time dependant manner as shown by the release of substances absorbing at 273 nm. We were able to conclude that these major components are of particular interest in fighting coccidiosis since they have a destructive effect on oocysts at very low concentrations. They could also help in the formulation of radical and safe solutions to coccidiosis.

Keywords: Essential oil component, Eimeria oocyst, oocysticidal activity

Introduction

Coccidiosis is one of the most common chicken diseases caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria that can seriously affect the health and the productivity of livestock. Eimeria infection is transmitted through hardy, thick-walled spore oocysts able to survive for long periods in the poultry litter and soil particles. Outside of the animal’s body (soil and litter), farmers usually fight this disease by disinfectants against oocysts and treat the animals themselves by antiparasitic drugs against oocysts that have infected the gut of the animal. Environmental oocysts are refractory to most commonly used disinfectants. The only compounds that have been found to consistently have useful oocysticidal activity are ammonia, methyl bromide, carbon disulfide and some phenolic products, as reported by Hilbrish et al. (1975) and Williams et al (1997). On the one hand the toxicity of these products makes them impossible to use for disinfecting the broiler house in presence of animals, and on the other hand, they represent a danger to the staff that performs the disinfection. In a research by Chapman (1984), Harper and Makatouni (2002),the problem of resistance to antiparasitic agents used against infecting oocysts has led to higher treatment doses which yielded residues in poultry products. The works published by Giannenas et al (2003), Oviedo-Rondo´n  et al (2006) and Da Silva et al (2009) have reported the in vivo efficiency of natural plant extracts in the treatment of coccidiosis.  

The works conducted by Rhayour et al (2003), Chami et al (2004,2005) and Bennis et al (2004) have already demonstrated the antimicrobial action of several essential oils (EO) of aromatic plants and some of their components on bacteria and fungi in vitro and in vivo. Recently, Remmal et al (2011) have demonstrated that EOs are efficient to destroy Eimeria oocysts in vitro. Since each EO is a mixture of many components, we tested the oocysticidal activity of some of their major components; in order to verify if they are among the active principles that are responsible of the EO’s effect.     

Material and Methods

 
Eimeria Oocysts Isolation and Purification

Oocysts used in this work were isolated from fresh feces of broilers suffering from coccidiosis in Morocco. They were purified by flotation in a saturated solution as described in the book by Shirley (1995) and maintained by periodic passage through young chicken in our laboratory. The washed oocysts were then stored at -20°C with 50% (v/v) glycerol. We obtained therefore a stock of oocyst from which we drew aliquots for each of the experiments.
 
The Counting of Oocysts

The number of oocysts was determined by transferring 25 µl of the sample suspension of Eimeria oocysts to Malassez chamber for microscopic examination and counting. Eimeria sp oocysts were counted in 10 fields of view by using standard techniques described by Ryley et al (1976), and the mean number of oocysts per milliliter of sample was calculated. The identification of Eimeria species in the faecal samples used in this work was done on the basis of the microscopic observation allowing the distinction of the Emeiria species according to the method described in the book by Brugere-Picoux and Silim (1992). The percentage of each species in the mixed suspension was approximately 45% E. tenella, 32% E. maxima, 10% E. acervulina , 6% E. necatrix and 7 % E. mitis.
 
The Effect of EO Components on the Number of Oocysts

All components used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (France). The screening of the ability of the eight components to destroy Eimeria oocysts was carried out. The components were: isopulegol, carvacrol, carvone, eugenol, cineol, cinnamaldehyde, carveol and thymol. They were dispersed in liquid medium containing 0.2% agar in pure water. This dispersion method has been improved by Remmal et al (1993a and 1993b). Each component was tested with increasing concentrations (0; 0.3; 0.5; 1; 2; 4; 10 and 20 mg/mL). The activity of each component was determined in triplicate in 96 well microplates by incubation at ambient temperature for 24 h of an inoculum of 20 µl containing 1.52 107 oocysts / mL put in direct contact with 40 µl of the EO component at various concentrations for a final volume of 200µl. We plugged our data on different curves expressing the number of oocysts with respect to the concentration of EO components. The LC50 values was then inferred from these curves.
 
The Effect of Salinomycin and Robenidine on the Decrease of the Number of Oocysts

The action of salinomycin and robenidine was tested using the previously described method with EO components with the following concentrations 10, 25, 50 and 100 mg /mL.
 
The Decrease of the Oocyst’s Number in Parallel with the Release of Substances Absorbing at 273 Nm after Treatment with Increasing Concentrations of EO Components

The release of cellular material absorbing at 273 nm from oocysts cells treated with increasing concentrations ofcarvacrol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol, and eugenol was determined. This experiment was performed on aliquots incubated for 24h at ambient temperature with one milliliter suspension containing:

– 100 µl of washed suspension of Eimeria oocysts at 1.52 x 107 oocysts /mL.

– 700 µl of PBS Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) (containing 8g/ L NaCl; 0.2g/ L KCl; 1.13g/ L Na2HPO4; 2H2O and 0.2g/ L   KH2PO4).

– 200 µl increasing concentrations of the selected EO components (0; 0.3; 0.5; 1; 2; 4; 10 and 20 mg /mL).

After incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 320 g for five minutes at 4°C. 500 µl of the supernatant were used to measure the UV absorption by Beckman spectrophotometer. Preliminary experiment showed that 273 nm is the absorbance peak of the supernatant regardless of what major component was used. Correction was made for the absorption of the suspending liquid containing the same concentration of the component centrifuged after two minutes of contact with oocysts. For each concentration, the oocyst number was counted as previously described.
 
Time Course of the Decrease of the Oocyst Number, in Parallel with the Release of Substances Absorbing at 273 Nm after Treatment with 4 Mg /Ml of the EO Component

100 µL of washed suspension oocysts incubated with 200 µl components at 4mg/mL and 700 µL of PBS at ambient temperature were treated for different periods of time: 0 min, 30 min, 1; 2; 3; 4; 5 and 24h. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 320 g for five minutes at 4°C. 500 µl of the supernatant were used to measure the UV absorption by Beckman spectrophotometer. After each period of time, the oocyst number was counted as previously described. All tests have been repeated three times under the same conditions.
 
Results

The screening of the eight EO components tested shows that the number of oocyst decreases after the treatment with the majority of the components used in a dose dependent manner at a concentration ranging between 0.3 and 20 mg/ml. When expressed in terms of lethal concentration 50% (LC50) (Table 1), our results show that the most efficacious components are carvacrol followed by carvone, isopulegol, thymol, and eugenol according to their LC50less than 2 mg /ml.

Table 1: LC 50% of Eight EO Components

599816-tab-1

The Effect of Salinomycin and Robenidine

dose-response test shows that the number of oocyst decreased slightly with the increasing concentrations of the two antiparasitic drugs tested at the concentrations 10, 25, 50 and 100 mg /mL . The salinomycin effect is more pronounced than the robenidine one (result not shown).  

The Effect of EO Components Concentrations on Eimeria Oocyst Number and the Release of 273 Nm Absorbing Material after 24 H Treatment

Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E show that after adding the EO components of carvacrol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol or eugenol in concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 20 mg /ml, the number of oocysts noticeably decreases with very low concentrations (0.3 to 2 mg /ml). This treatment causes a considerable release of 273 nm absorbing material that increases in a linear manner according to the concentration of the oils.

599816-fig-1

Figure 1: The Effect of Carvacrol (A), Carvone (B), Thymol (C), Isopulegol (D), and Eugenol (E) Concentrations on Eimeria Oocysts Number and the Release of 273nm Absorbing Material

Time Course of the Decrease of the Oocysts Number and 273 Nm Absorbing Material Release from Eimeria Oocyst Treated by 4mg /Ml of EO Components

Figures 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D and 2E show that after treatment with 4mg /ml of carvacrol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol or eugenol for various periods of time, four hours contact were enough to reduce approximately 90% of the oocyst number. While this decrease of the number of oocysts occurs, we notice an increase of the release of 273 nm absorbing material from Emeiria oocyst that reached a maximum value approximately after five hours.

599816-fig-2

Figure 2: Time Course of the Decrease of the Oocysts Number and 273nm Absorbing Material Release from Eimeria Oocysts Treated by 4 Mg/Ml of Carvacrol (A), Carvone (B), Thymol (C), Isopulegol (D), and Eugenol (E)

Discussion

The control of coccidiosis using disinfectant agents in broiler house and the anticoccidial drugs administrated to chicken raise several issues that can be summarized in the following: Safety of staff who perform the disinfection, inability to use disinfectants in presence of animals because of their toxicity, the growing resistance to anticoccidial drugs mentioned by Stephan et al (1997) and the presence of residues of the anticoccidial drugs in poultry products already reported by McEvoy (2002) . These predicaments pushed us to look for a non-toxic alternative that has oocysticidal activity in vitro and that we could use as a disinfectant even in the presence of animals and as preventive or curative therapeutics. In addition to that, this treatment should not be of any threat to staff, animals and consumer.

Essential oils have been demonstrated to have oocysticidal activity in vitro as described by Remmal et al (2011). This is supported by many in vivo studies published by Greathead and Kamel (2006) and Da Silva et al (2009) that reported positive results after the treatment of experimental coccidiosis by some EOs or by thymol or carvacrol. In this work we are interested in testing the in vitro oocysticidal effect of some EO components and studying their mechanism of action.

The in vitro test was carried out in aqueous medium without detergent or solvent, using 0.2% agar as a dispersing agent of EO components according to the method developed by Remmal et al (1993a and 1993b). The release of substances absorbing UV was the evidence used to determine the oocysticidal mechanism of action. This method was used by Dixon and Chopra (1986) and Rhayour et al (2003) to demonstrate the bactericidal action of polymixine B. The fungicidal action of EO component has also been demonstrated by the same method by Bennis et al (2004).

We started the study by carrying out a screening in which we tested eight EO’s major components susceptible to damage oocysts because of their phenolic or aldehyde nature that have already been cited in published tests in vivo. The anticoccidial activity of thymol and carvacrol, which are the main constituents of the oregano and thyme EOs have been reported in in vivo tests by Ibrir et al (2001). The cineol and isopulegol along with the cinnamaldehyde and eugenol, carvone and carveol are used as poultry food additives in a research by Lee et al (2003 and 2004). Our results show that five phenolic components among the eight tested (carvacrol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol and eugenol), provoke an oocysticidal effect at low doses with an LC50 less than 2 mg/ml. These results confirm the published data in vivo showing positive action of EOs containing phenolic compounds in the treatment of the experimental coccidiosis cited above. They are also consistent with data showing the action of some oocysticidal phenolic chemical detergents in a research by Williams (1997).

In parallel with the screening carried out on the eight components of EOs, we have tested the ability of salinomycin and robenidine to destroy Eimeria oocyst. These two anticoccidial agents, normally used as food additives showed that after treatment with increasing concentrations, the oocyst’s number slightly decreased, while in the same conditions, the EOs components reduced the number of oocysts in a much more significant proportion. This result confirms the coccidiostatic known effect of the two drugs reported by Wilson (1976) and Schäfer et al (1984) and reveals the oocysticidal effect of EOs’ components tested.

During the microscopic counting of the oocysts treated by EO components, we have noted the presence of deformed oocysts with cracked wall and debris (results not shown). Hence the idea to shed light on the mechanism of action by evaluating the lysis of oocysts treated with a range of concentrations of the five powerful EO components selected. The oocyst lysis was determined by measuring the release of substances absorbing at 273 nm after treatment. The UV-absorbing material is an indication of the release of intracellular contents such as aromatic amino acids and nucleotides. The obtained results showed a parallelism between the decrease of the oocyst number and the increase of the 273 nm absorbing material in a dose-dependent manner after treatment with EO components. This allows us to conclude that the decrease in the oocysts number is due to an oocysticidal action of the tested molecules. To determine the time needed to observe this oocysticidal action, we have done a time course of the oocyst number reduction and oocyst lysis using the concentration 4 mg/ml. This concentration was chosen because it induces approximately 85 to 90% reduction oocyst number. We found that four hours contact were sufficient to destroy the majority of oocysts. Preliminary experiments have shown that no spontaneous lysis occurred with untreated oocysts after 24 hours in our experimental conditions. These in vitro results explain the positive effects obtained in vivo by Ibrir et al (2001) with thymol and carvacrol. A study conducted in our laboratory on the in vivoaction of these five EOs’ components on experimentally infected chicken yielded preliminary results that confirm their coccicidal action without resistance or recurrence after treatment interruption (results not shown).

From this in vitro study, it can be concluded that carvacrol, thymol, isopulegol, eugenol and carvone should be of particular interest since they have a destructive effect on oocysts at very low concentrations. To our knowledge, this is the first time that carvone, eugenol and isopulegol are tested in the context of the fight against coccidiosis. This work shows that the major components of essential oils tested separately possess an oocysticidal activity equivalent to that of the whole essential oils which are complex mixtures of ingredients. In our opinion, the use of these molecules in a pure state provides a better pharmacological and toxicological safety.
 
Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to Prof, Mohammed Bennis from the department of English in the faculty of letters, Dhar El Mehrez Fez and to Miss Imane Remmal from Al Akhawayn University for their assistance in checking the English of the manuscript.
 
References

Bennis, S., Chami, N., Chami, F., Bouchikhi, T. & Remmal, A. (2004). “Surface Alteration of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Induced by Thymol and Eugenol,” Letters in Applied Microbiology; 38 454-458.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Chami, F., Chami, N., Bennis, S., Bouchikhi, T. & Remmal, A. (2005). “Oregano and Clove Essential Oils Induce Surface Alteration of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae,” Phytotherapy Research, 19 (5) 405-408.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Chami, F., Chami, N., Bennis, S., Trouillas, J. & Remmal, A. (2004). “Evaluation of Carvacrol and Eugenol as Prophylaxis and Treatment of Vaginal Candidiasis in an Immunosuppressed Rat Model,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 54 909-14.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Chapman, H. D. (1984). “Drug Resistance in Avian Coccidia (A Review),” Veterinary Parasitology, 15 11- 27.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Dasilva, M. A, Pessotti, B. M. S., Zanini, S. F., Colnago, G. L. Rodrigues, M. R. A., Nunes, L. C., Zanini, M. S. & Martins, I. V. F. (2009). “Intestinal Mucosa Structure of Broiler Chickens Infected Experimentally with Eimeria Tenella and Treated with Essential Oil of Oregano,” Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, 39 (5) 1471-1477.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Dixon, R. A. & Chopra, I. (1986). “Polymyxin B and Polymyxin B Nonapeptide Alter Cytoplasmic Membrane Permeability in Escherichia Coli,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 18 557-63.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Giannenas, I., Florou-Paneri, P., Papazahariadou, M., Christaki, E., Botsoglou, N. A. & Spais, A. B. (2003). “Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Oregano Essential Oil on Performance of Broilers after Experimental Infection with Eimeria Tenella,” Archiv Für Tierernährung; 57: 99-106.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Greathead, H. & Kamel, C. (2006). ‘Encapsulated Plant Extracts to Fight Coccidiosis,’ Feed Mix, 14 18-21.
Google Scholar 

Guimaraes Junior, J. S., Bogado, A. L. G., Da Cunha, T. C. B. & Garcia, J. L. (2007). “In Vitro Evaluation of the Disinfection Efficacy on Eimeria Tenella Unsporulated Oocysts Isolated from Broilers,” Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, 16 67-71.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Harper, C. G. & Makatouni, A. (2002). “Consumer Perception of Organic Food Production and Farm Animal Welfare,”Brazilian Food Journal, 104 287—299.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Hilbrich, P. (1975). ‘Disinfection Tests on Eimeria Tenella Oocysts,’ Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift; 88 144-8.

Ibrir, F., Greathead, H. M. R. & Forbes, J. M. (2001). The Effect of Thymol/Carvacrol Treatments on the Performance of Broiler Chickens Infected with Eimeria Acervulina. Procedure Alternative Feed Antibiotics Anticoccidials in the Pig and Poultry. Meat Production. Oslo.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Lee, K. W., Everts, H., Kappert, H. J., Frehner, M., Losa, R. & Beynen, A. C. (2003). “Effects of Dietary Essential Oil Components on Growth Performance, Digestive Enzymes and Lipid Metabolism in Female Broiler Chickens,” British Poultry Science, 44 450-457.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Lee, K. W., Everts, H., Kappert, H. J., Van Der Kuilen, A. G., Lemmens, M. & Frehner Beynen, A. C. (2004). “Growth Performance, Intestinal Viscosity, Fat Digestibility and Plasma Cholesterol in Broiler Chickens Fed a Rye-Containing Diet Without or With Essential Oil Components,” International Journal of Poultry Science, 3 613-618.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

McEvoy, J. D. G. (2002). “Contamination of Animal Feed Stuffs as a Cause of Residues in Food: A Review of Regulatory Aspects, Incidence and Control,” Analytica Chimica Acta, 473 3-26.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Oviedo-Rondo’N, E. O., Hume, M. E., Hernandez, C. & Clemente-Hernandez, S. (2006). “Intestinal Microbial Ecology of Broilers Vaccinated and Challenged with Mixed Eimeria Species, and Supplemented with Essential Oil Blends,”Poultry Science, 85 854—860.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Remmal, A., Achahbar, S., Bouddine, L., Chami, N. & Chami, F. (2011). “In Vitro Destruction of Eimeria Oocysts by Essential Oils,” Veterinary Parasitology, 182 121-126.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Remmal, A., Bouchikhi, T., Rhayour, K., Ettayebi, M. & Tantaoui-Elaraki, A., (1993b). “Improved Method for the Determination of Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils in Agar Medium,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, 5 1179-84.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Remmal, A., Bouchikhi, T., Tantaoui-Elaraki, A. & Ettayebi, M. (1993a). “Inhibition of Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils by Tween 80 and Ethanol in Liquid Medium,” Journal de Pharmacie de Belgique, 48 352-356.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Rhayour, K., Bouchikhi, T., Tantaoui-Elaraki, A., Sendide, K. & Remmal, A. (2003). “The Mechanism of Bacterial Action of Oregano and Clove Essential Oils and of Their Phenolic Component on Escherichia Coli and Bacillus Subtillis,”Journal of Essential Oil Research, 15 286-292.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Ryley, J. F., Meade, R., Hazelhurst, J. & Robinson, T. E. (1976). “Methods in Coccidiosis Research: Separation of Oocysts from Faeces,” The Journal of Parasitology, 73 311-326.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Schäfer, H., Clauss, W. & Hörnicke, H. (1984). “Cationophore Properties of the New Polyether Antibiotic Salinomycin Investigated in Distal Rabbit Colon in Vivo and in Vitro,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 79 387-92.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Shirley, M. W. (1995). ‘Eimeria Species and Strain of Chickens,’ In Eckert, J., Braun, R. Shirley, M.W., Coudert, P. (Eds.), Cost 89/820. Biotechnology. Guidelines on Techniques in Coccidiosis Research.

Stephan, B., Rommel, M., Daugschies, A. & Haberkorn, A. (1997). “Studies of Resistance to Anticoccidials in Eimeria Field Isolates and Eimeria Strains,” Veterinary Parasitology, 69 19-29.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Williams, R. B. (1997). “Laboratory Tests of Phenolic Disinfectants as Oocysticides Against the Chicken Coccidium Eimeria Tenella,” Veterinary Record, 141 447- 448.
PublisherGoogle Scholar 

Wilson, R. G. (1976). “Studies on Short-Term Application of Drugs to Eimeria Tenella in Tissue Culture,” Parasitilogy,73 283-6.
PublisherGoogle Scholar