An Explanatory Model of Relational Orientation within Distribution Channels : A Conceptual Framework

This paper examines relational orientation within distribution channels, a domain which is still little explored and which raises controversies. Specifically, our aim is to propose an explanatory model of relational orientation within distribution channels. To this end, a theoretical analysis of relationships within distribution channels is conducted in view to better understand how companies of a distribution channel develop a relational orientation. A study of the variables that condition its implementation is carried out. This study points out to the role of relational norms and trust in developing a relational orientation within distribution channels.


Analysis
of relationships between manufacturers and retailers has often been centred on minimising costs and managing conflicts.The channels are considered independent, where each player seeks to reach their objectives and achieve profits at the expense of the other.However, with mutations and changes of the environment and with the emergence of relational marketing during the 90s, it became imminent to reconsider relationships between producers and retailers and to opt for collaboration and partnership, in terms of long-term, value-creating and mutuallybeneficial relationships.These relationships offer the different players an opportunity to create strategies and reach important performances (Frazier et al., 2009).
Relational orientation, mainly within distribution channels (DC), remains a domain relatively less explored and its examination raises some controversies (Lepers, 2003).Review of literature shows a disagreement on its evolution (Shadev, 2008;Zolkiewski, 2004).
What are the variables that condition implementation of a relational orientation within distribution channels?
In this paper, we first present the evolution of the analysis of exchanges within distribution channels.Then, we survey the relationships between relational norms and relational orientation, and discuss the mediating role of trust and address a conceptual framework of what determines relational orientation.Finally, we conclude with some implications.

The Transition from a Transactional Approach to a Relational Approach within Distribution Channels
Reviewing research focusing on studying exchanges within distribution channels shows an evolution of the analytical framework and disagreement in perspectives studying these systems (Table 1).First, it is from an economic perspective that exchanges between channels are studied.Economic proposals point to minimising costs as a way of coordinating between middlemen and to seeking selfish interests through opportunistic behaviour (Willamson, 1985).Transactions and players are considered independent from each other and the relationship ends once the transaction ends.However, this line of thinking seems to be restrictive (Jeanmougin, 1992).They adopt a shortterm transaction of exchanges and ignore the social and relational dimensions.
Moreover, the social approach came to uphold the limitations of the classic economics schools by considering distribution channels as a social system governed by psychological and behavioural aspects (Robicheaux and El Ansary, 1975;Stern and El Ansary, 1972).Behaviourist models essentially focused on two behavioural variables, power and conflict, as basic concepts for the study of exchanges within DC (Gaski, 1984;Gaski and Nevin, 1985).Nevertheless, the temporary version of these models remains limited in time.Channels are considered competitors and there is no research devoted to examining development of relationships in time.
With the integrative paradigm, the politicoeconomic model of Stern and Reve (1980), there is the joint consideration of the economic and sociological impulses.This paradigm offers a foundation for comprehending construction, development, maintenance and advancement in time inter-organisational relationships (Arndt, 1983).It reveals aspects of the relationships dynamics among each other within the DC, stands as the foundation of inter-firm relational approach and sets the transition from transactional marketing to relational marketing.(1980,1983).
Indeed, with relational marketing, exchanges are considered as a succession to independent transactions deprived from any social dimensions.There is independence between intervening parties, its end is planned and it is integrated within a line of thinking based on confrontations between players (Bagozzi, 1975;Dwyer et al. 1987;MacNeil, 1980;Heide, 1994).However, in relational marketing, exchanges represent a set of inter-related repeated transactions.It is considered as a continuous temporary process (Morgan and Hunt, 1994;Berry, 1995).Moreover, exchanges go beyond its intrinsic nature to reach a social dimension (Arndt, 1983;Dwyer et al. 1987).Exchanges are assimilated for a relationship where partners communicate more information, engage in complex and durable social relationships and where relationships are customized based on cooperation and tarnished with a win-win situation (Guibert, 1996;Weitz and Jap, 1995;N'goala, 1998).
Within this relational perspective, the relationship is considered of much importance and interdependence is more pronounced (Kumar et al. 1995, Bonet andDannad, 2007;Abbad, 2007), relationships are based on commitment (Gundlach et al.1995;Narayandas and Rangan, 2004) and relational norms represent essential variables for regulating exchanges (Macneil 1980(Macneil , 1983) ) and play an important role in developing a relational orientation (Cannon et al. 2000;Paswan and Young, 1999;Ivens 2002 and2004 a, b, c;Nevin, 1995).According to Macneil (1980), inter-firms exchanges are influenced by norms.These norms represent "operating principals which link members of a group and allow for guiding, controlling and regulating correct and acceptable behaviours".Ten contractual norms, qualified as common are essential to conduct any exchange.Some are specific to transactional exchanges, others relate mainly to relational exchanges.

Relational Norms: Variables Related to Relational Orientation
Relational norms represent behaviours produced during relationships and which should be produced if the relationship continues in time (Macneil, 1983).These norms guide exchanges between independent firms and play an important role in developing close and long-term relationships (Heide and John, 1992;Sezer and Yilmaz, 2007).
Relational norms have been subject of extensive research.
Nevertheless, examining this research shows many disagreements.Review of the literature show that these norms are sometimes considered as independent variables (Gundlach et al. 1995;Cannon et al. 2000;Brown et al. 2000;Ivens, 2004, b, c) and sometimes as dependent variables (Lush et Brown, 1996).Other authors consider them as mediating variables (Lin et al. 2008).Moreover, there is a visible disagreement on the state of these norms and then on the number of relational norms which determine setting up a relational orientation.Macneil (1980) counts 5 relational norms essential to relational exchnages and which are: role integrity, solidarity, flexibility, harmony with social matrix and the supracontractual norms.Other researchers propose other relational norms needed to implement relational exchanges (Heide and Miner, 1992;Kaufmann and Dant,1992;Cannon et al. 2000;Ivens, 2004  Role integrity: it is the set of complex and long-term behaviours which imply various commitment related to the relationship.
Mutuality: it reflects the willingness to reciprocally improve players situation compared to a previous situation.
Flexibility: it is the willingness to make adjustments, revise contracts and make adaptations in case of changes of circumstances.
Solidarity: willingness to preserve and continue the relationship by the two partners given its importance (seeking to maintain and stabilise the relationship) Power restriction: it is when the player expects not using legitimate power (economic, social, legal or political) Harmonising relational conflicts: it reflects agreement between exchanging parties to resolve in an informal way conflicts which disturb exchange stability.However, none of these studies considered all these norms at once.Then and to study relational orientation between producers and retailers, we suggest to consider all these relational norms.
Review of literature reveals the role of relational norms while establishing relational exchanges and developing close relationships.Indeed, it seems that there is a relationship between the norms of solidarity, mutuality, role integrity, flexibility, power restriction and harmonisation of conflicts and development of a relational orientation.

• Role Integrity -Relational Orientation
Role integrity insures relationship stability and provides a condition necessary for its promotion and the development of durable win-win type relationships (Nevin, 1995;Ivens, 2004 a, b;Kaufmann and Stern, 1988).
H1a.The higher is role integrity norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

• Solidarity -Relational Orientation
Solidarity is linked to the process through which a relational exchange is created and reflects willingness to preserve the relationship because of a bilateral perception of relationship's higher value (Heide et John, 1992;Paswan and Young, 1999;Kim, 2000).
H1b.The higher is solidarity norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

• Flexibility -Relational Orientation
Flexibility is a positive effect on future interactions and building up economically efficient, reliable and mutually profitable relationships (Anderson and Weitz, 1989;Bello and Gilliand, 1997).
H1c.The higher is flexibility norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

• Mutuality of Relationship -Relational Orientation
Kaufman and Stern (1988) and Cannon et al. (2000) consider mutuality as an essential norm in relational exchanges while Izquierdo and Cliian (2004) maintain that mutuality is necessary to the development of relational orientation.
H1d.The higher is mutuality norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

Journal of Marketing Research & Case Studies
Power reduces stability and reliability of the relationships between producer and retailer and favours disruptions of relationships (Gaski and Nevin, 1985;Anderson et Weitz, 1989).Power restriction, however, positively favours continuity of relationship (Sibley and Michie, 1982).
H1e.The higher is power restriction norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

• Harmonisation of Relational Conflicts -Relational Orientation
Conflicts management through settlement allows for preserving an exchange relationship and joint resolution is mandatory to develop strong and solid relationships (Nevin, 1995).
H1f.The higher is harmonisation of conflicts norm, the stronger is relational orientation.

The Mediating Role of Trust in the Development of Relational Orientation within Distribution Channels
Trust emerges as a dynamic concept linked to the notion of relationship (Delerue and Bérrard, 2007;Lepers, 2003).It progresses in time and contributes to setting up and reinforcing relationships between partners.
It is considered an essential condition to establishing and continuing a relationship and a mediating variable of the success of relational marketing and the development of relational orientation within distribution channels (Morgan and Hunt, 1994;Ganesan, 1994;Geyskens et al. 1998;Izquierdo and Cliian, 2004).
To show that trust is a mediating variable of relational norms-relational orientation relationship, the following two links should be significant: • The link between relational norms and trust, • The link between trust and relational orientation

The Relationship between Relational Norms and Trust
• Role Integrity -Trust Role integrity has an effect on trust.It supposes honouring commitments which increases trust (Anderson and Weitz, 1989 ;Ivens, 2004 b).
H2a.The higher is role integrity norm, the higher is trust.
• Solidarity -Trust A higher degree of solidarity in an exchange relationship leads to more trust.The help and support of the partner increases trust (Sezer and Yilamz, 2007;Paswan andYoung, 1999, Geykens et al. 1998;Doney and Cannon, 1997).
H2b.The higher is solidarity norm, the higher is trust.
• Flexibility -Trust Abbad (2007) shows that flexibility has a positive effect on trust, while Sezer and Yilamz (2007) indicate, within a distribution context, that flexibility positively influences supplier's trust.
H2c.The higher is flexibility norm, the higher is trust.
H2d.The higher is mutuality norm, the higher is trust.
H'2e.The higher is power restriction norm, the higher is trust.
• Harmonisation of Conflicts -Trust Conflicts negatively influence trust (Geyskens et al. 1998) whereas joint settlement of crises and joint resolution of conflicts play a positive role in trust building (Wietz and Jap,1995;Abbad, 2007) H'2f.The higher is harmonisation of conflicts norm, the higher is trust.

The Relationship between Trust and Relational Orientation
There is a unanimous agreement that trust is linked to relational marketing and that it represents a key dimension of the development of relational exchanges.It is a requirement for coordination and collaboration leading to relational exchanges (Gundlach and Murphy, 1993;Morgan and Hunt, 1994;Izquierdo and Cliian, 2004;Nevin, 1995;Ganesan, 1994).
By extrapolation, we have these tested relationships between relational norms and trust and trust and relational orientation.

H2.
Trust is a mediating variable of the relationship between relational norms and development of relational orientation.

A Summary of the Explanatory Factors of Relational Orientation within Distribution Channels: A Conceptual Model
Then, and after having identified the independent variables of relational orientation within distribution channels and having formulated the hypotheses about the links between the different variables, we propose the conceptual model of the determinants of relational orientation within distribution channels which includes the following independent variables: role integrity, solidarity, flexibility, mutuality, power restriction, harmonisation of conflicts and includes trust as a mediating variable between relational norm and relational orientation (Figure 2)

Conclusion and Implications
Within the framework of a better comprehension of the relationships within distribution channels, and from an academic viewpoint, this study contributes to studies on relational orientation by suggesting a conceptual model of the determinants of relational orientation within channels.
This work allowed for clarifying the nature of the link and the explanatory power of Macneil's relational norms (1980)  This model will be subject of an empirical validation through a questionnaire-based survey of producers of massivelyconsumed products.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: The Conceptual Model of the Determinants of the Development of Relational Orientation within Distribution Channels

Table 2 : Retained Relational Norms
a, b) for the development of relational orientation within distribution channels.It points as well to the key role of trust in installing relational orientation and its importance as a mediating variable of the relational norms-relational orientation relationship.The proposed conceptual model is a reference to enrich the conception of relational orientation and the development of partnership relationships between producer and retailer.It integrates itself within a new vision which favours continuous and close relationships mainly within the economic and financial context the world is witnessing today.