The Influence of Development on Managerial Capabilities and Performance : Empirical Evidence from Pakistan

“What people respect about the companies is not how they are structured or their specific approaches to management, but their capabilities. You can’t see or touch them, yet they can make all the differences in the world when it comes to market value and give investors confidence in future earnings” Smallwood & Ulrich (HBR 2004). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of “development, on creating superior managerial capabilities that impact on organizational performance”. The study findings revealed “Two link value chain relationship: development creating managerial capabilities and managerial capabilities creating performance”. This value chain relationship was tested in the context of size and ownership of the organization and found interesting empirical evidence: Multinational and large sized Pakistani organizations create learning culture and invest on development that enhance their managerial capabilities leading to improved performance although there is no direct relation between size and ownership of the organization with managerial capabilities and performance. Small sized Pakistani organizations lack development framework and learning culture that adversely influence the development of managerial capabilities; leading to poor managerial performance and overall firm performance and sustainability. The organizations focusing on development: creating learning culture, investing on capacity building, and empowering managers to take managerial decisions, are more likely to have superior managerial capabilities. The organizations can capitalize on superior managerial capabilities and make them imitable competitive advantage over their competitors. The study finding can be used to develop consultancy framework for performance improvement.


Introduction
The resource-based view of the firm (RBV) and the resultant resource-based theory __________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Kazi Afaq Ahmed (2017), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2017.164526 Slotegraaf et al. ( 2003); Vorhies and Morgan (2005 ).The term resources of the firm can be divided into " Resources " and "Capabilities", the resources are extrinsic and tradable, can be acquired and easy to duplicate and exchange.The tangible resources, that are rare, controlled by the firm and costly to replace for the competition can only be short-term competitive advantage.The capabilities are special type of intangible resource, organizational embedded, firm specific, and non transferable.The capabilities of the organization are evolved, build, and represent the personality of the organization that is imitable and difficult to replace for the competition.
"The fast emerging global economy, increasing competition and volatile environment have posed new challenges, and increased the importance of developing scarce and imitable resources: organizational capabilities" Collis & Montgomery, (1995) ;Hamel, 1994;Prahalad & Hamel, (1990), that could be the sustainable competitive advantage.The previous research studies revealed that Human Resources interventions and system have influence on the performance of the organizations and businesses, Richardson andThompson 1999, Cooper (2000).
An article of Harvard Business Review "Capitalizing on Capabilities" discussed different management capabilities and their importance.It suggests that the companies are not valued for their structure, management style, and approaches: companies are respected for their capabilities, capacity to innovate and quality of intangible resources and determine the personality of the organization.The superior managerial capabilities are attained as a result of investment on developing the managerial skills and knowledge of people, providing a learning culture, empowering them and providing managerial context where managers have freedom to take their professional decisions.
Although earlier research work is available, that depicts the relationship between development, managerial capabilities and managerial performance; however, organizational performance in the context of the organizations operating in the developed countries could not be traced.
The organizations are giving more importance and investing on tangible assets of the organization to improve performance and ensure sustainability of the organizations.There is relatively limited attention paid to invest on developing the managerial capabilities that directly influence performance.The organizations are not giving due attention to internal environment and inculcating the learning culture that have direct impact on building the superior managerial capabilities.The local family businesses and organizations lack the appropriate understanding of the importance of the managerial capabilities and their impact on organizational performance.They are reluctant to invest on building the capabilities of the people and creating the learning environment where people can learn and develop effectively that impact on the performance of the organization.The motivation behind this research study was to find the empirical evidence in respect of the relationship between development and capabilities, enabling the entrepreneurs, corporate leaders and Human Resources professionals to understand the impact of development on performance.There are always arguments and burning questions in respect of the impact of training and development on the performance of the organization, during the business planning meetings and performance review.Thus, the study finding will help the HR professionals to develop the performance improvement framework using development as a tool.

Problem Statement
There is a relationship between managerial capabilities, managerial performance and organizational performance.However, we could not trace the previous studies on value chain relationship between development, managerial capabilities, and performance in the context of organizational size, and ownership in the developing countries.

Significance of study
The research study results will be helpful to develop the consultancy framework to improve performance, by using development (learning culture, management development, managerial context and managerial discretion) as a tool to create superior managerial capabilities.This study results will provide a strong argument to HR professionals and management to justify the investment on developing "capabilities".

Objective of study
The objective of the research study was to examine the relationship between development, managerial capabilities and managerial performance and its influence on the overall organizational performance: in the context of size of the organization and ownership.

Previous work
Managerial Capabilities Penrose (1959: 46) argued that the managerial skills and managerial knowledge of the individuals are integrated to achieve the managerial capabilities of the company.When the individual capabilities are combined and pooled up, they can deliver better results as a team and provide additional services.He further stated that every individual as a member of the team, can capitalize upon each other's strengths, skills and knowledge, take the advantage of the environment and the system and achieve enhanced productivity.Sanchez and Heene (1996) said that the managers as a group, when they continue working together and capitalizing on each other's knowledge and skills, their collective wisdom, and capabilities available to the organization, become permanent and together with the communication, learning culture, and development, determine the personality of the organization, In the study conducted by Boeker & Karichalil (2012), they stated that developing managerial capabilities is necessary for growth.Lado, Boyd, and Wright (1992) Helfat, 2003;Caldeira & Ward, 2003;Helfat & Peteraf, 2003).Their prior research indicates that the manager's knowledge & skills are the bases of managerial capabilities.The organizations are required to continue investing on developing the knowledge and skills to attain superior managerial capabilities that can be used by the organizations to improve performance (Mahoney, (1995: 92).
In "The Management of Resources and Resource of Management", Mahoney, 1995: 92) discussed that the effectiveness of the management team depends on their managerial capabilities, skills and personal attributes that are critical, and are required to have sustainable competitive advantage in the market.This uncertainty poses numerous challenges for managers, policymakers and researchers, (Teeter, Preston;Sandberg and Jorgen (2016) for we still have a poor understanding of how such uncertainty affects organizational responses and the ability of organizations to generate unique capabilities..The senior management of the organizations needs to have a broad set of complementary skills available.Any individual employee, argued by Barney andMahoney (1991,1995), no matter how competent, can not have all managerial skills required to operate the complex operations of the business; therefore, organizations build and develop all required capabilities to attain superior

Performance
The management capabilities have significant impact on performance (Suci, 2009); if an entrepreneur has good management capability, they can increase performance.Collis (1994:145) defines organizational capabilities "as the socially complex routines that determine the efficiency with which firms physically transform inputs into outputs" which means organizational capabilities are embedded in the routines of a firm, they reflect the system of an organization and are part of the company's culture and the employee's ́ networks.As defined by Winter (2003:991), the organizational capability is "a high-level routine (or collection of routines) that, together with its implementing input flows, confers upon an organization's management a set of decision options for producing significant outputs of a particular type."Collis (1994: 145-146) claims that superior managerial capabilities "allow firms to more efficiently and effectively choose and implement the activities necessary to produce and deliver a product or service to customers."Choi and Shepherd, (2004: 381) denote that Managerial capability is skills, knowledge, and experience of a firm, to be able to handle difficult and complex tasks in management and production.The study of the concept of capability studied at organizational level has revealed its link with the performance of the business, by Niemelä, (2004).Bailey & Helfat, 2003;Carmel & Tishler, 2004;Henderson, 2003;Holley, Greenley, Cadogan, & Fahy, 2005;Winter, 2003 explained that there is a relationship between capability of the organization and performance, since the managerial capability of the organization is a capability therefore, managerial capability has a relation with performance.
The importance of intangible resources has been emphasized by the authors of the literature on strategic management (Collis, 1994;Hamel & Prahalad, 1996;Prahalad & Hamel, 1990;Wernerfelt, 1984Wernerfelt, , 1995)), Therefore, human resources plays an important role in the competitiveness of a company (Aragón- Sanchez & Sanchez-Martin, 2005).The above discussions lead to the following hypothesis: H-3: Managerial capabilities have significant effect on performance, irrespective of size and ownership of the organization.

Development
Learning Culture : Denison, (1990, p. 2) defines the organizational culture as "underlying values, beliefs, and principles that serve as foundation for the organization's management system as well as the set of management practices and behaviors that both exemplify and reinforce those basic principles".While & Hall (1992) are of the view that, "organizational culture serves as a function to explain the type of activity that the organization is engaged upon and the lifecycle stage that the organization has reached".
Organizational culture plays an important role in successful knowledge management.The organizations are required to establish an appropriate culture to encourage people to create and share knowledge within an organization Eppler & Sukowski, (2000).Klein, Masi, and Weidner (1995) discussed that the organizational culture is the core to improve its products and services quality, and overall effectiveness.
Organizational culture applies to the organization as a whole, in the way it sets organization apart from others and also binds its members together.Hence, Hall, (1993) argued that in order to be a contributor to the competitive advantage, the organizational culture of an organization requires a higher quality standard in perception, and a high level of abilities to change, to react to challenge, and to learn from the external environment and the internal organization.
Many strategic researchers have studied the role of organization culture to create competitive advantage.As Barney (1986) for example, who claimed organizational culture as valuable, rare, and imperfectly imitable resources, which is a source of sustainable competitive advantage.The learning culture being crucial to management effectiveness is widely understood, and a large literature exists on the 'learning organization' and the nature of organizational culture.Kilmann (1996) defines a learning organization as: a learning organization describes, controls and improves the processes by which knowledge is created, acquired, distributed, interpreted, stored, retrieved and used, for the purpose of achieving long-term organizational success.

Managerial
Development

Methodology
The structured questionnaire was adopted to get the structured and standardized responses for statistical analysis purposes.The survey method and face-to-face interview approach was used.The interview technique was found effective and delivered good results because it provided opportunity to the researchers to probe and get right answers.The questionnaire comprised of total 47 questions divided into three sections: 1) Managerial Capabilities (managerial knowledge & skills), 2) Development (learning culture, management development, managerial discretion, managerial context) and, 3) Managerial Performance.
The random sampling technique was used in selection of the sample organizations that included the organizations from manufacturing and service sector.The data were collected from the organizations that included local and multinational organizations, representing small, medium and large size organizations.The respondents' sample was also selected on random basis the respondent were selected from senior management, middle management and junior level to ensure the feedback from all level of management.

Findings & Discussions
The perception survey responses were analyzed on the Likert scale using SPSS, and examined; the linkages between various constitutes of development, managerial capabilities and performance, as a result following co-relations have been explored between these variables and their sub variables.The face to face interviews using structured questionnaire also validated the results of the perception survey that has established a structural relationship between; development and managerial capabilities, managerial capabilities and managerial performance, and managerial performance and organizational performance.
The personal interviews and meeting with the people using qualitative techniques also revealed that the organizations having learning culture, and investing on people development initiatives, demonstrated better managerial knowledge and skills at work in managing teams, and were found to be effective in achieving the objectives.The perception survey on performance of the organization also revealed that the organizations demonstrated better managerial capabilities, also performed better in terms of their profitability, growth and employee satisfaction.These findings support the resource based view of the organization that organizational capabilities are intangible, rare, non tradable, imitable and difficult to replace for competition thus a sustainable competitive advantage.The organizations with superior managerial capabilities have demonstrated sustained performance and growth trends.

Managerial Capabilities
A firm achieves its managerial capabilities by integrating the managerial knowledge and skills of individuals, Penrose, (1959: 46).Organizational culture plays an important role in successful knowledge management.The organizations are required to establish an appropriate culture to encourage people to create and share knowledge within an organization, Eppler & Sukowski, (2000).
The empirical study results (table -1   The empirical study revealed that the managerial performance has linkage with; managerial skills, managerial development, managerial discretion, and managerial context.The face to face interviews, and observations made during the study depict that those organizations who have developed the managerial skills of their managers, empowered them in taking managerial decisions, and created an environment where they can freely exercise managerial powers using professional knowledge and skills, have shown better performance.The performance indicators: firm profitability, market share, growth and employee satisfaction were found to have positive relation with managerial capabilities and managerial performance.Thus, these findings confirm the existence of a two links values chain relationship between development managerial capabilities and performance.These findings are also supported by the resource based view of

Large, Medium and Small Organizations
The objective of the study was to examine the relationship between managerial capabilities and performance in the context of organizational size.
The perception survey results determined that the large organizations have better managerial capabilities as compared to small organizations.The co-relation between the size of the organization and managerial capabilities was also evident from the managerial performance of the people.In large organizations, people demonstrated better managerial capabilities and personal attributes as compared to small organizations.The further investigations revealed that large size organizations are more structured and have focus on developing the managerial capabilities.They create learning culture where innovation, creativity and learning initiatives are encouraged, facilitated and appropriately rewarded.The small local organizations lack learning culture and investment on developing managerial capabilities that adversely impact on their performance.
Therefore the hypothesis: "Managerial capabilities and performance has no relation with the size and ownership of the organization" has not been fully accepted.The ownership and size of the organization impact on performance because small organizations are not investing on the development of capabilities.The large organizations invest on development that positively impacts on their managerial capabilities that create higher performance.

Multinational versus Local Companies
The objective of the study was to examine the co-relation between managerial capabilities, development and performance in the context of organizational ownership (local vs. multinational).The study results identified three critical areas lacking in local organizations: learning culture, managerial discretion and managerial context.The local organizations are not investing on the development of the capabilities and lack learning culture.The managers are not fully empowered, managerial context is lacking and authority is more centralized and controlled.Interestingly, the survey results also determined a co-relation between performance and development.The multinational companies have learning culture, empowerment and managerial context that positively influence their performance.
Therefore, the hypothesis: "learning culture is crucial to managerial effectiveness, in both multinational and local organizations" has been proved.The comparative analysis validated our earlier findings that: development creating superior managerial capabilities and capabilities creating performance has also been validated.

Conclusion and Implications
We have examined enormous amount of research work to study the relationship between managerial capabilities and performance and found sufficient evidence of the impact of managerial capabilities on performance.However this study has explored a simple value chain relationship: "development" creating "managerial capabilities" and "managerial capabilities" "creating performance".This value chain relationship was tested in the context of size and ownership of the organization and found interesting empirical evidence that validated our findings: Multinational and large organizations create learning culture and invest on development that enhance their managerial capabilities leading to improved performance, although there is no direct relation between size and ownership of the organization with managerial capabilities and performance.
Local and small organizations lack development framework and learning culture that adversely impact on their managerial capabilities, therefore poor managerial performance leads towards declining performance.However, there is no direct relation of the size of the organization with managerial capabilities, and performance.
It is recommended that the empirical study results to be transformed into consultancy framework for performance improvement create superior managerial capabilities by using "development" as a tool, and use (2017), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2017.164526 (2017), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2017.164526 ) validated the earlier research work, and determined a strong co-relation between managerial skills and learning culture, and moderate co-relation between learning culture and: managerial context, managerial discretion and managerial development.These results are indicative of the influence of development on managerial capabilities and the existence of a structural relationship between managerial capabilities and development.The organization that creates learning culture, invests on development of managers, develops managers by empowering them, and provides autonomy and freedom to take their own professional managerial decisions, is more likely to have better managerial capabilities.These findings have also confirmed our hypotheses H1 & H2.

Figure: 1
Figure: 1 Managerial performance __________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Kazi Afaq Ahmed (2017), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2017.164526 the organization whereby; the capabilities of the firm are valuable intangible resource, imitable, and difficult to replace, thus a sustainable competitive advantage for the firm.