Students’ Opinion on the Quality of Distance Learning during the Ukrainian Pandemic Reality

This article shows the opinion of Ukrainian students (from six different cities of Ukraine) about the quality of distance learning after having one-year experience with such type of education during Pandemic times. The survey was conducted in several main directions: attitudes towards distance learning, key factors influencing the quality of distance learning and forms of teaching that students would prefer in the future. The main purpose of this research is an estimation of perspectives on distance learning usage drawing on the Ukrainian student's current experience in such type of education. The study showed that the majority of answered students (557 respondents) could clearly imagine the potential use of distance learning forms even when Covid-19 is over and also admitted that the quality of distance learning after a year’s experience is higher compared with its quality at the beginning.

concentration while physically being in a more comfortable environment for oneself); (2) professional (the level of training of the teaching staff for distance learning, their study of new opportunities that can improve the quality of the presentation of the material, as well as the qualifications of technical specialists providing the distance learning system in the institution, and the technical support's willingness to assist users in any difficult situations), and (3) technical (availability of appropriate hardware and software) (Paliwoda-Pękosz, Stal i Wojtowicz, 2015;Adarkwah, 2021;Mintii, Shokaliuk, Vakaliuk, Merzlykin i Mintii, 2020). In Ukraine, the research has been conducted for several years on the introduction and implementation of massive open online courses (Kukharenko, 2013;Sapargaliyev, 2014;Vakaliuk T. et al., 2020), and on distance education in the context of learning a specific subject (Nowacki i Banachowski, 2009;Syvyi, Mazbayev, Varakuta, Panteleeva i Bondarenko, 2020;Dovbenko, Naida, Beschastnyy, Bezverkhnia i Tsybulska, 2020). However, due to the pandemic, the study of distance education in Ukraine has become more acute, which has led to an increase in the number of research works related to distance learning (Kaliuzhka, et al., 2020;Bakhov, Opolska, Bogus, Anishchenko, & Biryukova, 2021;Shevchenko, Malysh, & Tkachuk-Miroshnychenko, 2021). Our study is one of the few that presents the bigger picture of learning during the pandemic, owing to embracing the data from several universities. In particular, the purpose of the study is to analyze the point of view of students on the level of readiness of the educational system for distance learning and prospects for the development of this type of learning in the future. We would like to answer the following research questions: RQ1: Has the students' attitude to remote learning changed as a result of the pandemic, and how? RQ2: Which were the key factors that influenced the quality of distance learning? RQ3: What forms of teaching would students prefer in the future?
The paper is organized as follows. The next section presents the research background that is followed by the description of the research method. Then, the results of empirical research are presented and discussed. The main research outcomes are summarized in the Implications and Conclusion sections.

Distance learning before the pandemic
The scientific community in Europe has been conducting research on the readiness of different countries (like the United Kingdom, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Poland, Belarus, Romania) for the distance learning process for a long time (Traxler, 2018;Vasilevska, Rivza, & Bogdan, 2017). Ukraine is no exception, and in this country this issue has been studied long before the pandemic. For example, in the years 2016-2019, a number of studies were carried out, the results of which showed that distance learning will enter common use in Ukraine in the future and that digital technologies will be gradually implemented in the educational process (Blayone, et al., 2018;Nosenko, Popel, & Shyshkina, 2019). The following advantages of distance learning were identified (Markova, Glazkova, & Zaborova, 2017;Pogorilyj, Dudikova, Yakymenko, Poyda, & Koval, 2020;Nenko, Кybalna, & Snisarenko, 2020;Kovbasnyuk & Styfanyshyn, 2020): • possibility to choose the time and place of study (except for video conferencing and synchronous online lessons), • flexibility, • opportunities to save time (participants of the educational process do not spend time to get to the place of classes), • savings (for transport, eating in restaurants, etc.).
However, a number of problems were also discovered that were related mainly to (Nenko, Кybalna, & Snisarenko, 2020;Didkivska, 2020;Prokopenko & Berezhna, 2020): • insufficient qualifications of some teachers; reluctance to innovate; conservatism, which resulted in a low level of personal motivation to work with the use of remote technologies, • excessive bureaucracy in implementing distance learning, which, together with the low financing of technology development and the need to modernize courses, did not allow for the creation of a real working model of remote education, • lack of appropriate equipment and Internet access for students living in rural areas,

Distance learning in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic
At the moment, we can observe the impact of COVID-19 on many industries, however the biggest influence seems to be on the medicine and education branches (McKibbin & Fernando, 2020;Ferrel & Ryan, 2020). The educational systems of many countries were forced to adapt to the situation, and for the majority, distance education became the optimal way of education facilitation (Bojović, Bojović, Vujošević i Šuh, 2020; van Slyke, Clary, Tazkarji i Ellis, 2021; Assaf i Gan, 2021).
Ukraine was one of the many countries that, despite some experience in the distance education industry, was not ready for a quick transition to distance learning. However, over time, most students and teachers were able to adapt to the extraordinary conditions and continue to create an effective educational process (Nenko, Кybalna, & Snisarenko, 2020;Prokopenko & Berezhna, 2020).
At this stage of the research, the methods of analysis, systematization, and generalization of scientific literature on the problems of the introduction of distance learning were used in order to highlight the current areas of research, as well as a praximetric method for analyzing the pedagogical experience of implementing distance learning and identifying key issues in this area.

Research Method
The paper presents a preliminary result of joint research conducted by members of the faculty of Cracow University of Economics, Poland, and Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Ukraine.
In the first step of the research, the questionnaire in Polish has been developed on the basis of the Polish-Ukrainian team's experience. At this stage, the method of concretization and systematization of theoretical knowledge was also used to develop the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to a number of academics and students with request to check its understandability and clarity.  Figure 1).

Fig. 1. Quantitative correlation of respondents
It should be noted that 28.5% of the respondents indicated that they have high quality technical support, 35% indicated that their quality of technical support is above average, 27.8%medium quality, 6.8% -below average quality, and 1.8% -poor quality, respectively. This indicates that the vast majority of respondents have a sufficient level of technical support to ensure the effectiveness of the educational process.

Attitudes towards distance learning (RQ1)
As for the attitudes of students to Internet communication, it was found that after the beginning of the pandemic there are less students who have a neutral attitude toward communication via the Internet and there is a slight increase in the number of students who prefer this form of communication. Comparative analysis of respondents' answers is presented in Figure2. When trying to establish the respondents' attitude to distance learning (not only in organized forms, but also, for example, educational videos on YouTube), it was found that for 15.1% of the respondents it was the best form of education before the pandemic, while during the pandemic the percentage of such students increased to 22.1%; 41.8% of respondents indicated that they like this form of education and they used it periodically before the pandemic, and 42.5% use it now. 28.5% of the students indicated a neutral attitude to this type of education before the pandemic, and 19.4% during the pandemic. Among the respondents there were those who did not like such training, but they used it before the pandemic -10.4%, and during the pandemic -11.8%. The same percentage of respondents (4.1%) indicated that they do not like such training and they avoid it both before the pandemic and during the pandemic. As a result, we can conclude that there is an increase in the respondents' level of acceptance of this type of learning.
As far as the experience of the respondents' interaction with various forms and means of distance learning before and during a pandemic is concerned (Table 1), it was found that about half of the respondents had experience of using online conferences and webinars before the pandemic, while during the pandemic this increased to about four-fifth. Besides, the number of respondents working on streaming platforms increased from one third to two thirds during the pandemic. Among the distance learning tools that were most in demand among students were learning management systems (LMS), which are commonly used not only for distance learning, but also for blended learning.

Key factors influencing the quality of distance learning (RQ2)
According to the survey results, lectures, seminars and consultations were more effective in distance learning than in full-time study, while practical classes and laboratory work were less effective. It is worth noting that for each form of classes, on average a quarter do not see the difference between full-time and distance forms of their organization. Comparative analysis of the respondents' answers is presented in Figure 3.

Fig. 3: Students' evaluation of the effectiveness of various forms of distance learning
Factors in the quality of education include typical interactions (teamwork, interaction with the lecturer, interaction with other students), understanding of the material, interest in involvement and the level of comfort during the lesson. On average, two fifths of the respondents do not see the difference between stationary and distance learning for these factors but for the latter one, for which one fifth of the respondents saw no difference. The level of comfort during classes has improved during distance learning (this is evidenced by the answers of two thirds of the respondents). Comparative analysis of the respondents' answers is presented in Figure 4. On average, 42% of the respondents do not see a difference in the effectiveness of the assessment of knowledge and skills using various forms.
Comparative analysis of the respondents' answers is presented in Figure 5.

Forms of teaching that students would prefer in the future (RQ3)
An interesting fact is that on average 71% of the respondents agreed that each of the proposed forms of learning can be used in the distance learning mode in the future, at least sometimes. Comparative analysis of the respondents' answers is presented in Table 2.

Analysis and Discussion
After analyzing the results of the survey, we could conclude that: • Not all students studying in higher education institutions of Ukraine have the sufficient technical support for distance learning; about 9% of the respondents answered that their technical support is insufficient (it should be noted that the questionnaire was distributed via e-mail, and therefore the potential respondents who have this problem could not have had access to the questionnaire).
• Despite the fact that students' attitudes towards distance learning have not changed significantly, students' awareness of various forms and means of distance learning has greatly increased.
• There is a significant increase in the level of students' interaction with various forms and tools of distance learning during the pandemic compared to the period before the pandemic.
• According to respondents, lectures, seminars and consultations are more effective in distance learning than in full-time, but lessons such as practical or laboratory classes in distance form are not welcomed by students.
• Most of the students don't see a difference or feel an increase in the quality of education or the effectiveness of various knowledge assessment forms in the context of distance learning.
• The level of comfort during the lesson for students became much better during distance learning.
• The vast majority of respondents agreed that each of the proposed forms of distance learning can be used in the future at least from time to time.
• The majority of students predicted the use of hybrid learning in future education.

Implications
This study has demonstrated the view of students of selected higher education institutions in Ukraine on the introduction of distance learning in the context of the pandemic. The results of this study can be used to create a comparative description of the conditions for the introduction of distance learning in different countries. The results showed that most Ukrainian students are accustomed to distance education and are ready to use elements of distance learning in the future. This allows teachers to assess the prospects of developing educational institutions and adapting curricula to the current educational needs of students.

Conclusion
The article analyzed the opinion of 557 Ukrainian students regarding the current state of distance education and the prospects for its development.
At the present stage of introduction of distance learning technologies in the educational process of higher education institutions in Ukraine, we can conclude that students are ready for distance learning and have the technical capacity to do so. In addition, the pandemic situation has taken universities to a new level, as evidenced by a survey on what form of education is possible after the end of the pandemic. Most students agree that after the end of the pandemic, it is possible to introduce at least some elements of distance learning by means of hybrid learning. In future research, we would like to conduct a comparative study on the basis of data from Ukraine and Poland.