@article{monika2014comparative,
  title = {Comparative Evaluation of Erosive Potential of Common Acidic Beverage on Esthetic Restorative Materials -A SEM Study},
  author = {Monika and Rajan Dhawan and Shivani Dhawan},
  year = 2014,
  url = {https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/DENT/2014/739216/},
  journal = {Journal of Research and Practice in Dentistry},
  volume = 2014 (2014),
  pages = 9,
  doi = 10.5171/2014.739216,
  abstract = {Thus the aim of present study was to assess the erosive potential of commonly used beverage over esthetic restorative material, which are traditional GIC and composite. In this study two tooth colored restorative materials were chosen and erosive materials selected were Orange juice and Yakult. Extracted maxillary anterior teeth were taken. All crowns were stored in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution until usages. Standardized U shaped cavities were prepared on labial aspect of these specimens and divided into 2 groups with 18 samples each. Group A restored with GIC and Group B restored with composite. Each group that was previously restored further divided into 3 subgroups with 6 samples each depending upon type of erosive solution used to treat them. All samples were evaluated under SEM at magnification of 400x. The erosive damage of material surface was compared using SEM images. The degree of damage to esthetic material by erosive acids was assessed within five ranks criteria. Results show the value of resin containing materials in providing surface protection to tooth material in patients experiencing continuous severe endogenous or exogenous erosion.},
  keywords = {Erosion, Acidic beverages, Esthetic.},
  note = Article ID: 739216
}